INNOVATIV
Band 79: Janet Wagner Band 78: Philip Franklin Orr Band 77: Carina Dony Band 76:
Linda Freyberg
Sabine Wolf (Hrsg.)
Band 75: Denise Rudolph Band 74: Sophia Paplowski Band 73: Carmen Krause Band 72:
Katrin Toetzke
Dirk Wissen
Band 71: Rahel Zoller Band 70: Sabrina Lorenz Band 69: Jennifer Hale Band 68:
Linda Schünhoff
Benjamin Flämig
Band 67:
Wilfried Sühl-Strohmenger
Jan-Pieter Barbian
Band 66: Tina Schurig Band 65: Christine Niehoff Band 64: Eva May Band 63: Eva Bunge Band 62: Nathalie Hild Band 61: Martina Haller Band 60: Leonie Flachsmann Band 59: Susanne Göttker Band 58: Georg Ruppelt Band 57: Karin Holste-Flinspach Band 56: Rafael Ball Band 55: Bettina Schröder Band 54: Florian Hagen Band 53: Anthea Zöller Band 52: Ursula Georgy Band 51: Ursula Jaksch Band 50: Hermann Rösch (Hrsg) Band 49: Lisa Maria Geisler Band 48: Raphaela Schneider Band 47: Eike Kleiner
Bestellen Sie jetzt online!
2. Juli 2025
  WEITERE NEWS
Aktuelles aus
L
ibrary
Essentials

In der Ausgabe 4/2025 (Juni 2025) lesen Sie u.a.:

  • Neue Anforderungen an Führungs­kompetenz in wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken
  • KI in der Katalogisierung: Drei Chatbots auf dem Prüfstand
  • Mehr als nur eine ID: Warum Forscher ORCID nutzen und warum nicht
  • Anxiety in der Hochschullehre: zögerlicher Einsatz von ChatGPT
  • Smart Reading in Bibliotheken: Aktive Beteiligung von Leser:innen
  • Kinder im digitalen Zeitalter:
    OECD-Bericht zeigt Handlungsbedarf für Politik und Bildungseinrichtungen
  • Bibliotheken und ihre Rolle beim Klimaschutz
  • Initiative für eine unabhängige Infrastruktur biomedizinischer Literatur –
    ZB MED entwickelt PubMed Alternative
  • Leiterin der Library Of Congress entlassen
  • Data Citations –
    Datenauswertung in Bibliotheken
  • Unternehmen investieren gezielt
    in künstliche Intelligenz
  • Springer Nature spendet KI-Werkzeug „Geppetto“ an die Verlagsbranche zur Bekämpfung betrügerischer Einreichungen
  • Die San José State University
    setzt auf Ihren ersten KI-Bibliothekar
u.v.m.
  fachbuchjournal

New research integrity AI tool added
to Springer Nature’s growing portfolio

A new AI tool to identify irrelevant references in submitted manuscripts has been launched for use across Springer Nature’s journals and books. The tool is the latest AI-driven tool that has been developed in-house at Springer Nature to weed out problematic submissions and ensure the veracity of the publication record.

The tool will be used by Springer Nature’s Research Integrity Group (RIG) to assess submissions to almost all journals and books published by Springer Nature, analysing the relevance of each reference used. If a number of references are identified as irrelevant, the submission will be flagged to RIG who will manually check the manuscript and decide whether the submission should be withdrawn.

The irrelevant reference checker tool has undergone multiple rounds of testing and validation to ensure it provides a precise and reliable assessment of references across academic disciplines, and training and development of the tool will be ongoing. Human oversight will always remain in place, in line with Springer Nature’s AI Principles.

Chris Graf, Director of Research Integrity at Springer Nature, commented: “As the use of AI to generate fake research papers becomes more effective, reference checking provides a key opportunity to identify these unethical efforts. The addition of this tool to our existing checks will help us to catch many unethical submissions that would otherwise progress to take up editors’ and peer reviewers’ time.”

The launch of the irrelevant reference checker tool comes just ten months after the launch of two other AI tools to detect problematic submissions that Springer Nature has developed in-house. The first, Geppetto, supports the identification of papers that contain AI-generated fake content, the second, SnappShot, those that contain problematic images.

Graf added: “Fake research is a challenge that affects the entire publishing industry and is something that Springer Nature will not tolerate. From creating AI tools, to building a now 50-strong expert research integrity unit, to developing our employees’ and editors’ expertise through training, we are absolutely committed to ensuring the robustness of published research for researchers to build upon.”